Research Online

Logo

Goldsmiths - University of London

Comparing Print Coverage and Tweets in Elections: a Case Study of the 2011-2012 US Republican Primaries

Murthy, Dhiraj and Petto, Laura R.. 2015. Comparing Print Coverage and Tweets in Elections: a Case Study of the 2011-2012 US Republican Primaries. Social Science Computer Review, 33(3), pp. 298-314. ISSN 0894-4393 [Article]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

Social media platforms including Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr, etc. have become more ubiquitous. They have had an increasing role in social movements, elections, and everyday life around the world. Social science is well positioned to explore the power and influence of social media economically, politically, and socially. This article is particularly interested in evaluating whether the sentiment of traditional print media coverage during elections has any relationship to the frequency of election-related tweets. Though television is perhaps more influential in terms of political news, social media is often used to retweet or comment on articles from print journalism. Also, though we increasingly consume news from social media, we often do not think of how opinions are converging or divergent during major events. This article specifically explores the case of the 2011-2012 US Republican primaries. 99 randomly selected articles from the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post covering Republican primary debates were hand coded for sentiment and compared with the frequency and sentiment of candidate-related geo-located tweets from urban American users. We also explored whether there is any relationship between print media, and tweet sentiment briefly. Overall, the newspapers sampled as a whole had a weak relationship to tweet frequency and sentiment. Though there is a large presence of journalists on Twitter, the medium is clearly not a facsimile of print media and that other opinions, values, and sentiments may have a stronger influence within the medium. This study is significant both in its mixed methods approach as well as its finding that traditional print media coverage is not generally related to the frequency or sentiment of election-related tweets despite Twitter’s role as a key space for news production and consumption.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314541925

Keywords:

Twitter, elections, print media, sentiment, newspapers, 2012 Republican primary

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Sociology

Dates:

DateEvent
1 June 2015Published
14 July 2014Published Online

Item ID:

10403

Date Deposited:

20 Jun 2014 14:38

Last Modified:

15 Jan 2018 11:04

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/10403

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)