Research Online

Logo

Goldsmiths - University of London

Holistic Versus Featural Facial Composite Systems for People with Mild Intellectual Disabilities

Gawrylowicz, Julie; Gabbert, Fiona; Carson, Derek; Lindsay, William and Hancock, Peter. 2012. Holistic Versus Featural Facial Composite Systems for People with Mild Intellectual Disabilities. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), pp. 716-720. ISSN 0888-4080 [Article]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

Limited verbal abilities might act as a barrier to witnesses with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) to provide accurate testimony. This might be particularly problematic when the police need to create a facial composite image. Contrary to featural composite systems such as Electronic Facial Identification Technique (E-FIT), holistic systems such as Evolutionary Facial Identification Technique (EvoFIT) do not require the witness to provide a verbal description of a perpetrator's face. Instead, they rely more on face recognition, which may make them more suitable for people with ID. The current study compared the performance of people with and without ID at creating composites using E-FIT and EvoFIT. Although ID composites created with EvoFIT were more often accurately identified than E-FIT composites, the performance of ID participants was overall very poor across both systems and considerably poorer than that of non-ID participants. The implications of these findings for practitioners working in the Criminal Justice System are discussed.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2850

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Psychology
Psychology > Forensic Psychology Unit

Dates:

DateEvent
September 2012Published

Item ID:

10670

Date Deposited:

23 Sep 2014 14:38

Last Modified:

30 Jun 2017 15:09

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/10670

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)