Research Online

Logo

Goldsmiths - University of London

Changing the Criterion for Memory Conformity in Free Recall.

Wright, Daniel; Gabbert, Fiona; Memon, Amina and London, K. 2008. Changing the Criterion for Memory Conformity in Free Recall. Memory, 16(2), pp. 137-148. ISSN 0965-8211 [Article]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

People's responses during memory studies are affected by what other people say. This memory conformity effect has been shown in both free recall and recognition. Here we examine whether accurate, inaccurate, and suggested answers are affected similarly when the response criterion is varied. In the first study, participants saw four pictures of detailed scenes and then discussed the content of these scenes with another participant who saw the same scenes, but with a couple of details changed. Participants were either told to recall everything they could and not to worry about making mistakes (lenient), or only to recall items if they were sure that they were accurate (strict). The strict instructions reduced the amount of inaccurate information reported that the other person suggested, but also reduced the number of accurate details recalled. In the second study, participants were shown a large set of faces and then their memory recognition was tested with a confederate on these and fillers. Here also, the criterion manipulation shifted both accurate and inaccurate responses, and those suggested by the confederate. The results are largely consistent with a shift in response criterion affecting accurate, inaccurate, and suggested information. In addition we varied the level of secrecy in the participants’ responses. The effects of secrecy were complex and depended on the level of response criterion. Implications for interviewing eyewitnesses and line-ups are discussed.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701836174

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Psychology
Psychology > Forensic Psychology Unit

Dates:

DateEvent
2008Published

Item ID:

12150

Date Deposited:

16 Jul 2015 12:00

Last Modified:

30 Jun 2017 15:09

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/12150

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)