Research Online

Logo

Goldsmiths - University of London

How effective is retrieval support for witnesses with different levels of working and source memory?

Krix, Alana; Sauerland, Melanie; Mercklebach, Harald; Gabbert, Fiona and Hope, Lorraine. 2015. How effective is retrieval support for witnesses with different levels of working and source memory? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, pp. 335-348. ISSN 2044-5911 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
Krix et al., 2015, JCP, accepted version.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (407kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

The present study examined the effectiveness of retrieval support for witnesses who differ in working memory capacity (WMC) and source monitoring abilities. We hypothesised that the provision of retrieval support, relative to free recall, would compensate deficits linked to lower working memory and source monitoring abilities by providing more structure and context cues for retrieval. Thus, we expected no associations between recall performance and WMC and source monitoring abilities in the retrieval support group, but significant positive associations in the free recall group. This study combined data from two experiments (N = 125) in which participants either received retrieval support with the Self-Administered Interview or completed a free recall along with working and source memory tests. Contrary to our expectations, presence of retrieval support did not moderate the relationship between WMC and recall performance. In one of two source memory tests, higher source memory scores were associated with more accurate accounts in the retrieval support group, whereas in the free recall group, lower source memory scores were associated with higher recall accuracy. This suggests that individuals with lower source memory abilities may not benefit from retrieval support. We encourage replication with a more heterogeneous sample.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.1003219

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Psychology
Psychology > Forensic Psychology Unit

Dates:

DateEvent
23 December 2014Accepted
27 January 2015Published Online

Item ID:

18838

Date Deposited:

25 Aug 2016 15:09

Last Modified:

10 Jul 2018 00:54

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/18838

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)