Research Online

Logo

Goldsmiths - University of London

EEG Signature and Phenomenology of Alpha/theta Neurofeedback Training Versus Mock Feedback

Egner, Tobias; Strawson, Emilie and Gruzelier, John. 2002. EEG Signature and Phenomenology of Alpha/theta Neurofeedback Training Versus Mock Feedback. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 27(4), pp. 261-270. ISSN 10900586 [Article]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

Alpha/theta (a/t) neurofeedback training has in the past successfully been used as a complementary therapeutic relaxation technique in the treatment of alcoholism. In spite of positive clinical outcomes, doubts have been cast on the protocol's specificity when compared to alternative relaxation regimes. This study investigated the basic tenet underlying the a/t training rationale, that accurate a/t feedback representation facilitates the generation of these frequency components. Two groups of healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to either (a) real contingent a/t feedback training or (b) a noncontingent mock feedback control condition. The groups were compared on measures of theta/alpha (t/a) ratios within and across training sessions, as well as activational self-report scales after each session. The contingent a/t feedback group displayed significant within-session t/a ratio increments not evident in the mock control group, as well as higher overall t/a ratios in some but not all of the training sessions. No differences were found between the groups in terms of subjective activational phenomenology, in that both groups reported significantly lower levels of activation after training sessions. The data demonstrate that irrespective of considerations of clinical relevance, accurate a/t neurofeedback effectively facilitates production of higher within-session t/a ratios than do noncontingent feedback relaxation.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021063416558

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Psychology

Dates:

DateEvent
2002Published

Item ID:

5227

Date Deposited:

16 Mar 2011 09:00

Last Modified:

30 Jun 2017 15:27

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/5227

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)