Pain perception, hypnosis and 40 Hz oscillations

Croft, Rodney J.; Williams, John D.; Haenschel, Corinna and Gruzelier, John. 2002. Pain perception, hypnosis and 40 Hz oscillations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46(2), pp. 101-108. ISSN 01678760 [Article]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

A number of brain regions are associated with the subjective experience of pain. This study adds to our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in pain by considering the relation between cortical oscillations in response to pain, with and without hypnosis and hypnotic analgesia, and the subjective experience of pain. Thirty-three subjects’ neural responses (EEG) were measured during the 40–540 ms period following phasic electrical stimulations to the right hand, under control and hypnosis conditions. Resultant FFT amplitudes for frequencies ranging from 8 to 100 Hz were computed. These were grouped into 7 scalp topographies, and for each frequency, relations between these topographies and pain ratings, performance and stimulus intensity measures were assessed. Gamma activity (32–100 Hz) over prefrontal scalp sites predicted subject pain ratings in the control condition (r=0.50, P=0.004), and no other frequency/topography combination did. This relation was present in both high and low hypnotisable subjects and was independent of performance and stimulus intensity measures. This relation was unchanged by hypnosis in the low hypnotisable subjects but was not present in the highs during hypnosis, suggesting that hypnosis interferes with this pain/gamma relation. This study provides evidence for the role of gamma oscillations in the subjective experience of pain. Further, it is in keeping with the view that hypnosis involves the dissociation of prefrontal cortex from other neural functions.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00118-6

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Psychology

Dates:

DateEvent
2002Published

Item ID:

5257

Date Deposited:

16 Mar 2011 10:06

Last Modified:

30 Jun 2017 15:27

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/5257

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)