Making methods sociable: dialogue, ethics and authorship in qualitative research

Sinha, Shamser and Back, Les. 2014. Making methods sociable: dialogue, ethics and authorship in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 14(4), pp. 473-487. ISSN 1468-7941 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
SOC_Back_2014.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (118kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

The article argues for fostering sociable forms of dialogue in qualitative research. Conventional research shares an emphasis on extracting narratives with judicial and invasive state modes of enquiry rather than on learning from a genuine two-way dialogue between participants and researchers. Using a study of young migrants, we show how involving participants as observers and shapers of analytical dialogue can produce circulations of communication oscillating across the researcher’s and participant’s horizons of understanding. This produces new insight, beyond the limits of qualitative investigation, that extracts information from participants, and in so doing, has the potential to affect shifts in perception that animate and enchant experience. It has consequences for rethinking authorship that share, credit and specify responsibility. Developing such an approach opposes the ‘ethical hypochondria’ characterising qualitative research culture, where ‘automatic anonymity’ is limiting the potential of research to travel, connect people and engage the public imagination.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113490717

Additional Information:

The research leading to the results received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme.

Keywords:

authorship, auto-ethnography, ethics, migration, participatory methods

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Sociology

Dates:

DateEvent
August 2014Published

Item ID:

10588

Date Deposited:

02 Sep 2014 10:21

Last Modified:

29 Apr 2020 16:09

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/10588

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)