The Prosocial Versus Proself Power Holder: How Power Influences Sacrifice in Romantic Relationships

Righetti, F.; Luchies, L. B.; van Gils, S.; Slotter, E. B.; Witcher, B. and Kumashiro, Madoka. 2015. The Prosocial Versus Proself Power Holder: How Power Influences Sacrifice in Romantic Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(6), pp. 779-790. ISSN 0146-1672 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
Righetti et al 2015 power and sacrifice.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (700kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

Romantic partners often have to sacrifice their interests to benefit their partner or to maintain the relationship. In the present work, we investigated whether relative power within the relationship plays an important role in determining the extent to which partners are likely to sacrifice. Drawing from both classic theories and recent research on power, we tested two competing predictions on the relationship between power and sacrifice in romantic relationships. We tested whether (a) power is negatively related to sacrifice and (b) power is positively related to sacrifice. Furthermore, we also explored whether the association between power and sacrifice is moderated by commitment and inclusion of the other in the self. To test our hypotheses, we used different methodologies, including questionnaires, diary studies, and videotaped interactions. Results across the five studies (N = 1,088) consistently supported the hypothesis that power is negatively related to tendencies to sacrifice in close relationships.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215579054

Keywords:

power, sacrifice, prosocial behavior, romantic relationships

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Psychology

Dates:

DateEvent
1 June 2015Published
25 March 2015Published Online
2 March 2015Accepted

Item ID:

17763

Date Deposited:

18 Jan 2017 12:07

Last Modified:

26 Jan 2021 20:10

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/17763

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)