previous | notes | PDF full text | next

“Two broad shining eyes”: Optic Impressions, Natural Imprints, and Landscape in Robinson Crusoe

Emmanuelle Peraldo

NOTES

1. The original text reads, “Le paysage est l’étendue du pays que l’œil peut embrasser dans son ensemble.” Unless otherwise indicated, all translations from the original French are mine.
Return to main text.

2. The original texts read, “le paysage est empreint, conjointement, de médiance et d’historicité” and “le paysage ne réside ni seulement dans l’objet, ni seulement dans le sujet, mais dans l’interaction complexe de ces deux termes.”
Return to main text.

3. Here Locke is citing a Cartesian idea.
Return to main text.

4. In the same work, Newton writes: “A body only exerts this force when another force, impressed upon it, endeavours to change its condition; and the exercise of this force may be considered as both resistance and impulse; it is resistance so far as the body for maintaining its present state, opposes the force impressed; it is impulse so far as the body, by not easily giving way to the impressed force of another endeavours to change the state of that other” (def. 3). For Newton’s theory of vision, see his Opticks (1704).
Return to main text.

5. The original text reads, “les paysages picturaux ou réels sont empreints de nos valeurs et de nos fantasmes” (Shusterman 16).
Return to main text.

6. The term “urbanature” was coined by Ashton Nichols in Beyond Romantic Ecocriticism: Towards Urbanatural Roosting.
Return to main text.

7. Two other articles deal with that issue: Maximillian E. Novak, “Crusoe the King and the Political Evolution of his Island,” and Ian A. Bell, “King Crusoe: Locke’s Political Theory in Robinson Crusoe.”
Return to main text.

8. This Cartesian will to be the master and owner of nature is part of the paradox of a Robinson Crusoe who is modern in spite of the fact that he is lost on his desert island.
Return to main text.

9. See Anthony N. Penna’s book, The Human Footprint: A Global Environmental History.
Return to main text.

10. The original text reads, “le principe de Fulton est simple et radical: ‘la seule chose que l’on devrait faire avec un paysage, ce sont des photographies. Les seules choses que l’on doit y laisser, ce sont les traces de ses pas’” (White 114) On geopoetics, see Kenneth White’s website, http://www.kennethwhite.org/geopoetique/.
Return to main text.

11. Samuel Johnson defines personification in his 1756 dictionary as “the change of things to persons,” quoted in Keenleyside, “Personification for the People: On James Thomson’s The Seasons” (447). Keenleyside adds that the Oxford English Dictionary identifies that entry as the first English use of the term. She also maintains that Thomson “acknowledges that we may not know what a person is. But he also suggests that we may not know what a person is not; or who (or what) is a person” (451).
Return to main text.

12. For other representations of the landscape as a body, see II.84, 102, 110.
Return to main text.

13. Lévy and Lussault analyze the virus of the flu as an actant in their Dictionary. Lussault’s analysis of how the epidemic process structures space and is structured by the social use of space in the case of SARS can be transferred to the reading of the plague and how it reflected the social occupation of the London space.
Return to main text.

14. For a discussion of sympathy and sensibility, see Mark Salber Phillips, Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain, 1740-1820, Julia A. Stern, The Plight of Feeling: Sympathy and Dissent in the Early American Novel, and Patricia Meyer Spacks, “Oscillations of Sensibility.”
Return to main text.

15. The original text reads, “On pourrait même se demander si, au lieu de ‘landscape’, il n’eût pas mieux valu forger ‘landart’ (en un seul mot), soulignant ainsi l’origine et la dimension artistiques de tous les paysages (ou ’paysarts’, en tant que pays artialisés, in situ, ou in visu.”
Return to main text.

16. The original text reads, “le paysage est dans le sujet (notre cerveau) comme il est dans l’objet (les choses de l’environnement).”
Return to main text.


WORKS CITED

Bell, Ian A. “King Crusoe: Locke’s Political Theory in Robinson Crusoe.” English Studies 69.1 (1988): 27–36. Print.

Berleant, Arnold. Living in the Landscape: Towards an Aesthetics of Environment. Lawrence: UP of Kansas, 1997. Print.

Berque, Augustin, ed. Cinq Propositions pour une théorie du paysage. Seyssel: Champ Vallon, 1994. Print.

———. “Identification of the Self in the Medial Process.” Conceptions of the Self in Japan. Ed. Nancy R. Rosenberger. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992. 93–104. Print.

———. Les Raisons du paysage: De la Chine antique aux environnements de synthèse. Paris: Hazan, 1995. Print.

Collot, Michel. Paysage et poésie: Du romantisme à nos jours. Paris: José Corti, 2005. Print.

Defoe, Daniel. A Journal of the Plague Year. 1722. Ed. Anthony Burgess. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966. Print.

———. Robinson Crusoe. 1719. Harmondsworth: Penguin Popular Classics, 1994. Print.

———. A Tour thro' the Whole Island of Great Britain. 1724–1726. Ed. John McVeagh. Writings on Travel, Discovery and History by Daniel Defoe. Gen. Ed. W. R. Owens and P. N. Furbank. 3 Vols. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2001. Print.

Gillian, Rose. Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity, 1993. Print.

Keenleyside, Heather. “Personification for the People: On James Thomson’s The Seasons.” English Literary History 76.2 (2009): 447–72. Print.

Lévy, Jacques, and Michel Lussault, eds. Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés. Paris: Belin, 2003. Print.

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. 1690. Ed. Roger Woolhouse. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1997. Print.

Marzec, Robert P. An Ecological and Postcolonial Study of Literature: From Daniel Defoe to Salman Rushdie. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Print.

Newton, Isaac. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. 1729. Newton’s Principles of Natural Philosophy. London: Dawsons of Pall Mall, 1968. Print.

———. Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light. London, 1704. Print.

Nichols, Ashton. Beyond Romantic Ecocriticism: Toward Urbannatural Roosting. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. Print.

Novak, Maximillian E. “Crusoe the King and the Political Evolution of His Island.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 2.3 (1962): 337–50. Print.

———. “Friday: or, the Power of Naming.” Augustan Subjects: Essays in Honor of Martin C. Battestin. Ed. Albert J. Rivero. Newark: U of Delaware P, 1997. 110–122. Print.

Penna, Anthony N. The Human Footprint: A Global Environmental History. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. Print.

Phillips, Mark Salber. Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain, 1740–1820. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2000. Print.

Pite, Ralph. “How Green were the Romantics?” Studies in Romanticism 35.3 (1996): 357–73. Print.

Roger, Alain. Court Traité du paysage. Paris: Gallimard, 1997. Print.

Shusterman, Ronald, ed. Cartes, paysages, territoires. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2000. Print.

Spacks, Patricia Meyer. “Oscillations of Sensibility.” New Literary History 25.3 (1994): 505–20. Print.

Stern, Julia A. The Plight of Feeling: Sympathy and Dissent in the Early American Novel. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1997. Print.

Swenson, Rivka. “Optics, Gender, and the Eighteenth-Century Gaze: Looking at Eliza Haywood’s Anti-Pamela.” The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 51.1–2 (2010): 27–43. Print.

Varey, Simon. Space and the Eighteenth-Century English Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1990. Print.

Vienne, Jean-Michel. Introduction. Essai sur l’entendement humain [An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690)]. Trans. Jean-Michel Vienne. Paris: Vrin, 2001. Print.

White, Kenneth. Le Plateau de l’albatros: Introduction à la géopoétique. Paris : Editions Grasset et Fasquelle, 1994. Print.

Williams, Raymond. The Country and the City. London: Chatto and Windus, 1973. Print.

Yolton, John W., ed. The Locke Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1977. Print .

previous | notes | PDF full text | next

 


Contact Us - 2009 Digital Defoe | ISSN 1948-1802 (online)