Introduction to the Special Issue on Social Media, Collaboration, and Organizations

Murthy, Dhiraj. 2015. Introduction to the Special Issue on Social Media, Collaboration, and Organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(1), pp. 3-9. ISSN 0002-7642 [Article]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

The use of social media by collaborative organizations has been studied in a variety of contexts, including virtual teams, enterprise organizations, and social movements. However, social media are not often examined within the context of scientific organizations. This article explores how an organization of 122 life scientists and science-related professionals—anonymized as Science City Network (SciCity)—combine monthly symposia with social media, including Twitter, Facebook, and blogs. Using an online survey, we found that younger SciCity members are more interested in using social media to support a collaborative community, whereas older members are more interested in social applications. Social media use was not found to significantly differ by gender. Using social network analysis, we found several individuals who act as hubs of information who keep the SciCity Twitter network alive. However, the hierarchical structure of the network reveals that it is better suited for information dissemination than innovation and collaboration. Our examination of this scientific organization ultimately offers insight into how a coalition of multiple social media technologies is used differentially by organizational members and that there is ultimately no general consensus of the utility of social media to scientific collaboration. This finding tempers some claims of the utility of social media for scientific collaboration.

Item Type:



collaboration, social media, virtual organizations, scientific organizations, meetups, virtual science

Departments, Centres and Research Units:



9 December 2014Published Online
1 January 2015Published

Item ID:


Date Deposited:

20 Jun 2014 14:44

Last Modified:

21 Apr 2021 13:28

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.


Edit Record Edit Record (login required)