‘Civility’ in contemporary debates about antisemitism

Hirsh, David. 2014. ‘Civility’ in contemporary debates about antisemitism. Jewish Quarterly, p. 39. [Article]

Hirsh JQ.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (148kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

We thought anti-Nazism was enough when we should have understood the complexities of antisemitism and we thought anti-colonialism and anti-racism were enough when we should have made more effort to forge a positive cosmopolitan politics.
Jews who worry about antisemitism are written off as tribal and self-interested; they are constructed as ‘Zionists’ and hence not as antiracists, intellectuals or legitimate members of the left. This hostile, external construction of Jews is in sharp contrast to the eager self-definition of the ‘as-a-Jew’ critics, who parade their Jewishness in order to discredit, in the eyes of the onlooking world, the fears of their fellow Jews.
We need to agree that antisemitism is serious and that it is real; it is not only a threat to Jews but it is also a threat to the labour movement, to intellectual culture and to wider society. Of course we need then to be able to present and discuss arguments and evidence as to what is antisemitic and what isn’t; how we define it and how we recognise it are rightfully up for democratic discussion. The phenomenon which most definitely closes off the possibility of civilized discourse is the claim that Jews raise the issue of antisemitism, knowing that they’re lying, in order to stifle free speech and criticism.

Item Type:



anti-Zionism; antisemitism;

Related URLs:

Departments, Centres and Research Units:



July 2014Published

Item ID:


Date Deposited:

08 Jul 2014 11:59

Last Modified:

29 Apr 2020 16:00



View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)