Pride and Prejudice: A Five Nation Study of Television News Coverage of the Olympics

Curran, James P.; Hayashi, Kaori; Kwak, Sunyoung; Esser, Frank; Hallin, Daniel C and Lee, Chin-Chuan. 2016. Pride and Prejudice: A Five Nation Study of Television News Coverage of the Olympics. Journalism Studies, 17(8), pp. 935-951. ISSN 1461-670X [Article]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

The Olympic Games are one of the most popular global mega-media events. However, the ways in which the opening of the 2012 Olympic Games in London were reported varied significantly from one country to another. In order to compare how different countries represented this event, we conducted a qualitative discourse analysis of three days of television news coverage from 10 channels in five countries: the United States, China, Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. We explored whether different locations, political systems, and television systems affect how the same event is reported. We found that while European public service broadcasters (BBC and ARD) were more serious, critical, and political than their commercial counterparts (ITV and RTL), the Japanese commercial broadcaster’s coverage of the event was more critical than that of the public service broadcaster, which was popularized and nationalistic throughout. In China, the more market-oriented Dragon TV was more evaluative in its reporting than the state-run CCTV. NBC, which monopolized the broadcast rights in the United States, emphasized the universal values of the Olympics and avoided nationalism. In light of our results, future attention should be directed toward the role of commercial broadcasting in a contemporary globalized world in which ideological constellations are changing.

Item Type:


Identification Number (DOI):


comparative media studies, media system, mega-media events, news framing, Olympic Games, sporting nationalism

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Media, Communications and Cultural Studies
Media, Communications and Cultural Studies > Goldsmiths Leverhulme Media Research Centre


13 March 2015Published Online

Item ID:


Date Deposited:

19 Oct 2015 11:15

Last Modified:

15 Apr 2021 11:57

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.


Edit Record Edit Record (login required)