“The Ends of Homo Sacer.” A review of a Roundtable discussion on the work of Giorgio Agamben.

Law, Christopher. 2015. “The Ends of Homo Sacer.” A review of a Roundtable discussion on the work of Giorgio Agamben. Postmodern Culture, 25(3), [Article]

[img] Text
620415
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (36kB)

Abstract or Description

On November 10, 2015 a group of four scholars of Giorgio Agamben’s work gathered at Goldsmiths, University of London for a roundtable organized by the college’s recently formed Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought (CPCT). Contributing to the event, and representing a diverse array of interests in Agamben’s work, were Jessica Whyte, Benjamin Noys, Jason E. Smith and Alberto Toscano (who, alongside the roundtable chair Julia Ng, acts as co-director of the CPCT). The event was dubbed “The Ends of Homo Sacer,” a title whose most obvious motivation was the recent publication of Agamben’s Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm and of L’uso dei corpi (recently published in English as The Use of Bodies). The former book, originally delivered as two lectures in October 2001, slots into an earlier position in Agamben’s nine-book Homo Sacer series, whilst the latter marks its ostensible termination, if not its completion. As is well known, the series has been published out of the order envisioned by Agamben himself (a confusion to which the delayed publication of Stasis adds, since it displaces a spot previously accorded to The Kingdom and the Glory). Both the elusive ordering of the project and the question of its conclusion provided food for thought throughout the evening; neither problem, needless to say, attained definitive closure.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.2015.0012

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Centre for Cultural Studies (1998-2017)

Dates:

DateEvent
May 2015Published

Item ID:

18598

Date Deposited:

23 Jun 2016 14:22

Last Modified:

23 Jun 2016 14:22

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/18598

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)