Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy

Lazzarini, Andres. 2015. Some Unsettled Issues in a Second Phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge Controversy. Review of Radical Political Economics, 47(2), pp. 256-273. ISSN 0486-6134 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
Lazzarini_2015(AAM_for_Goldsmiths_repo).pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (302kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

The aim of this paper is to clear up some issues in a second phase of the Cambridge-Cambridge capital theory controversies, when the neoclassical argument was chiefly conducted in terms of the Walrasian specification of capital in intertemporal and temporary general equilibrium models. It is held that the response by the neoclassical side in that phase has not been as satisfactory to rebut the implications of reswitching and capital reversing as some neoclassical scholars have argued. The reason for this can be traced in the overlooking of the implications of the redefinition of equilibrium implied in those models.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613414557916

Additional Information:

JEL codes: A10, B21, B22, B24, B40

Keywords:

Cambridge Controversy, capital, equilibrium, marginalist theory, Walras, neo-Walrasian models

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Institute of Management Studies

Dates:

DateEvent
23 September 2014Accepted
20 January 2015Published Online
1 June 2015Published

Item ID:

28121

Date Deposited:

27 Jan 2020 15:51

Last Modified:

09 Jun 2021 14:45

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/28121

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)