Inside, outside and in-between: ambiguity, fieldwork and ethnography

Cornish, Helen. 2015. Inside, outside and in-between: ambiguity, fieldwork and ethnography. DISKUS, 17(1), pp. 47-53. [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
cornish inside outside 2015.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (230kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

The extent to which researchers in religious fields claim membership of the group has long been a subject of debate in the social sciences. While many theoretical and methodological concerns have been thrashed out since the 1980s, which have resulted in a general consensus that prioritises “good research”, regardless of membership or position. However, in practice, the
faith status of the researcher continues to raise its head, either from
practitioner or scholarly quarters. In this short reflexive account I consider some implications of insider/outsider debates: I start by reflecting on recent conversations about my research status, and use these to explore the shadow the “Lurhmann effect” has cast on my relationships with British Witches and Wiccans and the ambiguous boundaries between inside and outside.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.18792/diskus.v17i1.66

Additional Information:

DISKUS Special edition: 'Interrogating integrity: reflections on the insider/outsider debate'

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Anthropology

Dates:

DateEvent
5 September 2015Published

Item ID:

28384

Date Deposited:

29 Apr 2020 09:25

Last Modified:

29 Apr 2020 17:27

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/28384

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)