Tkacz, Nathaniel. 2011. In defence of ANT : a reply to Johan Söderberg. Journal of Peer Production, ISSN 2213-5316 [Article]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

In response to Söderberg, Nathaniel Tkacz argues that the political insights afforded by ANT are not reducible to the Marxist tradition. He argues that ANT is especially well suited to describe how force flows through peer-production projects – projects which already perform their own critique of Capital. The final installment of this debate sees O’Neil argue that ANT’s ignorance of history and justice prevents it from constituting a credible alternative.

Item Type:	Article
Departments, Centres and Research Units:	Media, Communications and Cultural Studies
Dates:	Date Event July 2011 Published
Item ID:	34112
Date Deposited:	26 Sep 2023 10:35
Last Modified:	26 Sep 2023 10:36
Peer Reviewed:	Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.
URI:	https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/34112

Edit Record (login required)