Intention Seekers: Conspiracist Ideation and Biased Attributions of Intentionality

Tools

Brotherton, Robert and French, Christopher C.. 2015. Intention Seekers: Conspiracist Ideation and Biased Attributions of Intentionality. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0124125. ISSN 1932-6203 [Article]

Preview

Text
Brotherton&French2015.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (240kB) | Preview

Official URL: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.137...

Abstract or Description

Conspiracist beliefs are widespread and potentially hazardous. A growing body of research suggests that cognitive biases may play a role in endorsement of conspiracy theories. The current research examines the novel hypothesis that individuals who are biased towards inferring intentional explanations for ambiguous actions are more likely to endorse conspiracy theories, which portray events as the exclusive product of intentional agency. Study 1 replicated a previously observed relationship between conspiracist ideation and individual differences in anthropomorphisation. Studies 2 and 3 report a relationship between conspiracism and inferences of intentionality for imagined ambiguous events. Additionally, Study 3 again found conspiracist ideation to be predicted by individual differences in anthropomorphism. Contrary to expectations, however, the relationship was not mediated by the intentionality bias. The findings are discussed in terms of a domain-general intentionality bias making conspiracy theories appear particularly plausible. Alternative explanations are suggested for the association between conspiracism and anthropomorphism.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124125