‘Cultural policy as rhetoric and reality: a comparative analysis of policy-making in the peripheral north’

O'Brien, David and Miles, Steven. 2010. ‘Cultural policy as rhetoric and reality: a comparative analysis of policy-making in the peripheral north’. Cultural Trends, 19(1-2), pp. 3-13. ISSN 0954-8963 [Article]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

Any understanding of the relationship between place and cultural policy has largely been lost as part of a rhetorical critique of a neo-liberal regeneration which has, in turn, undermined the disciplinary basis of cultural policy. This has had particular consequences for our understanding of the impact of cultural policy in the peripheral north of England. Despite the political realities of geographical peripherality that still persist today, there are very few examples of research designed to address the ways in which cultural policy has been operationalized in the context of peripheral political cultures. This article presents findings from comparative research on cultural policy in Liverpool and NewcastleGateshead, with specific focus on the role of local government in cultural policy making, to show the importance of local political culture in shaping cultural policy. The intention therefore is to demystify the role of cultural policy beyond its value as a rhetorical policy device in a global economy to understand how such policy is used in practice to validate notions of the political particular. The aim is therefore to bridge the empirical gap between global and local assumptions about the role of cultural policy, whilst exploring the institutions underpinning local leadership and collaboration in arts and cultural policy.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1080/09548961003695940

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Institute for Cultural and Creative Entrepreneurship (ICCE)

Dates:

DateEvent
2010Published

Item ID:

12429

Date Deposited:

04 Aug 2015 09:04

Last Modified:

29 Jul 2016 10:43

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/12429

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)