Disputatious rhetoric and political change: The case of the Greek anti-mining movement’.

Hatzisavvidou, Sophia. 2017. Disputatious rhetoric and political change: The case of the Greek anti-mining movement’. Political Studies, 65(1), pp. 215-230. ISSN 0032-3217 [Article]

[img] Text
Disputatious rhetoric and political change_final.odt - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (108kB)
[img]
Preview
Text
Disputatious rhetoric and political change_final.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (300kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

Rhetorical scholarship has significantly contributed to our understanding of the role of confrontation in engendering social and political change, but it traditionally over-emphasises its moral aspect, which results in the simplification of public issues and the radicalisation of identities. This article introduces a distinct form of political rhetoric and analyses the rhetorical conventions that constitute it. Drawing material from the anti-mining movement formed in the region of Halkidiki, Greece, the article proposes that disputatious rhetoric, through employing the techniques of parrēsia, melodrama and antithesis, proves pertinent to the articulation of dissent, the formation of collective subjects, and the projection of a counter-hegemonic discourse which challenges dominant neoliberal practices and discourses. Disputatious rhetoric, the article concludes, encodes the possibility of social and political change, not least because it impacts on the meaning attributed to actions and prevents the solidification of a single narrative or discourse as commonsensical.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321715624425

Keywords:

rhetoric, disputation, political change, social movements, parresia

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Politics

Dates:

DateEvent
1 March 2017Published
29 April 2016Published Online
2 November 2015Accepted

Item ID:

16579

Date Deposited:

06 Jul 2016 15:07

Last Modified:

15 Jun 2021 05:53

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/16579

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)