Academics' responses to encountered information: Context matters
Pontis, Sheila; Kefalidou, Genovefa; Blandford, Ann; Forth, Jamie; Makri, Stephann; Sharples, Sarah; Wiggins, Geraint and Woods, Mel. 2015. Academics' responses to encountered information: Context matters. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), pp. 1883-1903. ISSN 2330-1643 [Article]
|
Text
SerenAPaper-JASIST-17-12-14.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (963kB) | Preview |
Abstract or Description
An increasing number of tools are being developed to help academics interact with information, but little is known about the benefits of those tools for their users. This study evaluated academics' receptiveness to information proposed by a mobile app, the SerenA Notebook: information that is based in their inferred interests but does not relate directly to a prior recognized need. The evaluated app aimed at creating the experience of serendipitous encounters: generating ideas and inspiring thoughts, and potentially triggering follow-up actions, by providing users with suggestions related to their work and leisure interests. We studied how 20 academics interacted with messages sent by the mobile app (3 per day over 10 consecutive days). Collected data sets were analyzed using thematic analysis. We found that contextual factors (location, activity, and focus) strongly influenced their responses to messages. Academics described some unsolicited information as interesting but irrelevant when they could not make immediate use of it. They highlighted filtering information as their major struggle rather than finding information. Some messages that were positively received acted as reminders of activities participants were meant to be doing but were postponing, or were relevant to ongoing activities at the time the information was received.
Item Type: |
Article |
||||||
Identification Number (DOI): |
|||||||
Additional Information: |
Ref statement: Our data has since been independently analysed to feed into a general model of information encountering [1]. Our novel evaluation method has also been employed in algorithms research to support serendipity [2] – helping bring the core ideas of our work closer to end-users. [1] https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_4 |
||||||
Keywords: |
information filtering, information use,serendipity |
||||||
Departments, Centres and Research Units: |
|||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||
Item ID: |
22331 |
||||||
Date Deposited: |
15 Nov 2017 16:35 |
||||||
Last Modified: |
24 Jul 2020 14:03 |
||||||
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed. |
||||||
URI: |
View statistics for this item...
Edit Record (login required) |