Audit failure and corporate corruption: Why Mediterranean patron-client relations are relevant for understanding the work of international accountancy firms

Shore, Cris. 2021. Audit failure and corporate corruption: Why Mediterranean patron-client relations are relevant for understanding the work of international accountancy firms. Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2021(90), pp. 91-105. ISSN 0920-1297 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
[15585263 - Focaal] Audit failure and corporate corruption.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (150kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

Patron-clientelism and corruption were traditionally viewed as problems endemic to underdeveloped marginal countries with weak states, powerful self-serving elites, and widespread civic disengagement. However, recent decades have seen a dramatic increase in corruption scandals in the Global North, particularly its more developed banking and financial sectors. Paradoxically, this has occurred despite a massive expansion in auditing by international accountancy firms (KPMG, PwC, Deloitte, EY) who oft en portray themselves as warriors of integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct. How are these trends connected? Drawing on anthropological studies of Mediterranean patron-clientelism, I illustrate how collusive relations between accountancy firms and their clients create ideal conditions for corruption to flourish. Finally, I ask how can these accountancy scandals help us rethink patron-clientelism in an age of “audit culture”?

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2020.072004

Keywords:

accountancy scandals, audit culture, Big Four, fraud and corruption, Mediterranean anthropology, patron-client relations

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Anthropology

Dates:

DateEvent
2018Accepted
1 October 2020Published Online
1 June 2021Published

Item ID:

26049

Date Deposited:

15 Mar 2019 12:04

Last Modified:

27 May 2021 08:25

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/26049

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)