Vitalism Now – A Problematic
Greco, Monica. 2021. Vitalism Now – A Problematic. Theory, Culture & Society, 38(2), pp. 47-69. ISSN 0263-2764 [Article]
|
Text
Vitalism now - final.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (227kB) | Preview |
Abstract or Description
This paper considers whether and how ‘vitalism’ might be considered relevant as a concept today; whether its relevance should be expressed in terms of disciplinary demarcations between the life sciences and the natural sciences; and whether there is a fundamental incompatibility between a 'vitalism of process' and a 'vitalism as pathos' (Osborne, 2016). I argue that the relevance of vitalism as an epistemological and ontological problem concerning the categorical distinction between living and non-living beings must be contextualised historically, and referred exclusively to the epistemic horizon defined by classical physics. In contrast to this, drawing on the philosophies of Canguilhem, Whitehead, and Atlan, I propose an appreciation of the contemporary relevance of vitalism premised on the pathic and indeterminate character of nature as a whole. From this perspective vitalism expresses a politically significant ethos concerning the relationship between life, knowledge, problems and their solutions.
Item Type: |
Article |
||||||||
Identification Number (DOI): |
|||||||||
Keywords: |
Canguilhem, life, pathos, problematology, process, vitalism, Whitehead |
||||||||
Departments, Centres and Research Units: |
|||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||
Item ID: |
26231 |
||||||||
Date Deposited: |
11 Apr 2019 14:56 |
||||||||
Last Modified: |
01 Mar 2022 04:04 |
||||||||
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed. |
||||||||
URI: |
View statistics for this item...
Edit Record (login required) |