Is digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia effective in treating sub-threshold insomnia: A pilot RCT

Tools

Denis, Dan; Eley, Thalia C.; Rijsdijk, Fruhling; Zavos, Helena M. S.; Keers, Robert; Espie, Colin A.; Luik, Annemarie I; Badini, Isabella; Derveeuw, Sarah; Hodsoll, John and Gregory, Alice M.. 2020. Is digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia effective in treating sub-threshold insomnia: A pilot RCT. Sleep Medicine, 66, pp. 174-183. ISSN 1389-9457 [Article]

Preview

Text
STOP revised ACCEPTED.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (908kB) | Preview

Preview

Text
STOP supplementary ACCEPTED.pdf - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (462kB) | Preview

Official URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...

Abstract or Description

Objective/Background: CBT for insomnia (CBT-I) is useful for many. It is currently unknown if those with sub-threshold insomnia also benefit. Here we assessed whether CBT-I is both feasible and acceptable in participants with sub-threshold insomnia. The primary aims were to evaluate participation rates and treatment acceptability, and to establish an effect size for symptom improvement.

Patients/Methods: A total of 199 female participants (Mage 20 ± 5 years) took part. Following baseline assessments, participants were randomly allocated to either a 6-week digital CBT-I intervention or a 6-week session control group receiving puzzles. Additional assessments were performed 3-weeks, 6-weeks, and 6-months later.

Results: Participation in each survey wave did not differ between the groups (ps > .140), though adherence to weekly tasks was lower in the CBT-I group, p = .02. Treatment acceptability was high (M (SD) = 33.61 (4.82), range 6 – 42). The CBT-I group showed greater improvement in insomnia symptoms at the end of the intervention compared to the control group (p = .013, d = 0.42), with significant variation in outcome (M = 4.69, SD = 5.41). Sub-threshold participants showed a similar pattern of results, whilst those meeting insomnia criteria showed a smaller between-group difference. CBT-I led to improvements in anxiety, paranoia and perceived stress between baseline and end of intervention. Changes in insomnia symptoms were mediated by cognitions about sleep and somatic pre-sleep arousal.

Conclusions: CBT-I provides a benefit even in sub-threshold insomnia. CBT-I may be useful as an early preventative intervention to tackle sleep problems before they manifest as chronic insomnia.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2019.10.007