Anti-communal, Anti-egalitarian, Anti-nurturing, Anti-loving: Sex and the 'Irredeemable' in Andrea Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon

Tools

Dymock, Alex. 2018. Anti-communal, Anti-egalitarian, Anti-nurturing, Anti-loving: Sex and the 'Irredeemable' in Andrea Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon. Paragraph, 41(3), pp. 349-363. ISSN 0264-8334 [Article]

Preview

Text
FINAL_Queering_Dworking_and_MacKinnon.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (262kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

The work of Andrea Dworkin and Catharine A. MacKinnon on sex and sexuality has often been posed as adversary to the development of queer theory. Leo Bersani, in particular, is critical of the normative ambitions of their work, which he sees firstly as trying to ‘redeem’ sex acts themselves, and secondly as advocating for sexuality as a site of potential for social transformation. In this article, I argue that this is a misreading of their work. Drawing on Dworkin's wide body of writing, and MacKinnon early essays in Signs, I suggest that their work makes no such case for sex or sexuality. Rather, by bringing their analysis into conversation with Halberstam's recent work on ‘shadow feminism’, I contend that Dworkin and MacKinnon's antisocial, anti-pastoral and distinctly anti-normative vision of sex and sexuality shares many of the same features of queer theory, ultimately advocating for sex as ‘irredeemable’.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.3366/para.2018.0276

Additional Information:

This is an accepted manuscript version of a paper published by Edinburgh University Press in Paragraph.

Keywords:

Andrea Dworkin; Catharine A. MacKinnon; second-wave feminism; anti-social queer theory; sex; sexuality

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Law

Dates: