The Perceptual Prediction Paradox
Press, Clare; Kok, Peter and Yon, Daniel. 2019. The Perceptual Prediction Paradox. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), pp. 13-24. ISSN 1364-6613 [Article]
|
Text
PredParadox TICS.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (639kB) | Preview |
Abstract or Description
From streams of noisy sensory information, we must generate perceptual experiences that are broadly accurate (veridical) and tell us what we did not already know (informative). Bayesian cognitive models propose that predispositions to perceive what we expect will generate more veridical experiences. However, conflicting cancellation models propose that we should perceptually prioritise the unexpected because it is informative. Recent findings from the learning literature may suggest a resolution. We may be initially predisposed to perceive what we expect to generate broadly accurate perceptual representations. However, later processes subsequently highlight unexpected signals that are sufficiently ‘surprising’. We will therefore broadly perceive what we expect, unless unexpected signals are likely to be informative for model updating.
Item Type: |
Article |
||||||
Identification Number (DOI): |
|||||||
Additional Information: |
We are grateful to Jennifer Cook, Peter Redgrave, and Floris de Lange for useful discussions, Emily Thomas for comments on the manuscript, and Gustav Kuhn for sharing his hollow face image. The work was supported by a Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2016-105) and Wellcome Trust (204770/Z/16/Z) grant awarded to C.P. |
||||||
Keywords: |
perception, learning, inference, expectation, surprise |
||||||
Departments, Centres and Research Units: |
|||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||
Item ID: |
28217 |
||||||
Date Deposited: |
24 Feb 2020 12:14 |
||||||
Last Modified: |
12 Jun 2021 18:42 |
||||||
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed. |
||||||
URI: |
View statistics for this item...
Edit Record (login required) |