The apparent action causation: Using a magician forcing technique to investigate our illusory sense of agency over the outcome of our choices

Pailhes, Alice and Kuhn, Gustav. 2020. The apparent action causation: Using a magician forcing technique to investigate our illusory sense of agency over the outcome of our choices. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), pp. 1784-1795. ISSN 1747-0218 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
PSY-Pai2020b.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (683kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text
1747021820932916.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (591kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

We often fall victim of an illusory sense of control and agency over our thoughts and actions. Magicians are masters at exploiting these illusions and forcing techniques provide a powerful way to study apparent action causation – the illusion that our action caused the outcome we get. In this paper, we used the Criss-Cross force to study whether people can tell the difference between an action which had an impact on the outcome they get and one which has no impact. In the Criss-Cross force, participants are asked to cut to a card, and whilst they are genuinely free to cut the cards at any position, the cut does not impact the card they are given (i.e. they always get the top card). We investigate the psychological processes that underpin the success of this force. Experiment 1 (N=60) showed that participants cannot tell the difference between a forced and a controlled outcome. Experiment 2 (N=90) showed that contrary to common magicians’ knowledge, misdirection does not play a role in the success of the force. Finally, experiment 3 (N=60) suggests that rather than misdirection, an attribute substitution error explains why people fail to understand that their action do not have an impact on the outcome they get. Debriefings also shows the importance of participants’ expectations in the perception of the trick, as well as the role of prediction of the outcome in participants’ sense of agency over the events.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820932916

Additional Information:

The JASP file with Bayesian analyses is available at:
https://osf.io/hbmn8.

Excel data files for Experiment 2 and 3 are available at:
https://osf.io/hw54e and https://osf.io/96zut.

Keywords:

Magic tricks, sense of agency, illusion of control, forcing techniques, free will, misdirection

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Psychology

Dates:

DateEvent
4 May 2020Accepted
1 June 2020Published Online
1 November 2020Published

Item ID:

28419

Date Deposited:

06 May 2020 14:50

Last Modified:

09 Jun 2021 21:17

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/28419

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)