Brown, Millie. 2020. The fear journey into art. Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London [Thesis]

No full text available

	Text (The fear journey into art) ART_thesis_BrownM_2020.pdf - Accepted Version Permissions: Administrator Access Only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (17MB)
	Text (Appendix A) Appendix_A.pdf - Supplemental Material Permissions: Administrator Access Only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (103kB)
	Text (Appendix B) Appendix_B.pdf - Supplemental Material Permissions: Administrator Access Only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (41kB)
	Text (Appendix C) Appendix_C_chapter_5finl.pdf - Supplemental Material Permissions: Administrator Access Only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (23MB)
	Text (Appendix D) APPENDIX_D_artwork_documentatn.pdf - Supplemental Material Permissions: Administrator Access Only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (50MB)
	Text (Bibliography) Bibilography_FINAL_CRRNTS_COMPLT.pdf - Bibliography Permissions: Administrator Access Only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (38kB)

Abstract or Description

The main contention of the thesis is that there are consequences within academia and the art field when intersectional methodologies are not taken seriously enough. The fear journey into art is defined as a working definition of an intersectional methodological approach to practice that situates multiple divisions of difference as a creative practice.

The thesis is in two parts: a dissertation and a practice. The dissertation defines what a fear journey looks like as both academic and creative tool to answer the thesis problem through an exploration of the lived experiences of my collaborators and my own journey. I propose the thesis itself as a performative model of an intersectional methodology by evaluating what contribution it makes as a whole and what methods are deployed in order to answer the main argument in the dissertation and in practice.

Item Type:	Thesis (Doctoral)
Identification Number (DOI):	https://doi.org/10.25602/GOLD.00028637
Departments, Centres and Research Units:	Art
Date:	31 May 2020
Item ID:	28637
Date Deposited:	03 Jun 2020 14:56
Last Modified:	07 Sep 2022 17:16
URI:	https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/28637

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record (login required)