A Critical Review of Standardized Measures of Hypnotic Suggestibility

Tools

Acunzo, David and Terhune, Devin Blair. 2021. A Critical Review of Standardized Measures of Hypnotic Suggestibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 69(1), pp. 50-71. ISSN 0020-7144 [Article]

Preview

Text
gold standard_FINAL.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (375kB) | Preview

Official URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207...

Abstract or Description

The most well-established finding gleaned from decades of experimental hypnosis research is that individuals display marked variability in responsiveness to hypnotic suggestions. Insofar as this variability impacts both treatment outcome in therapeutic applications of hypnosis as well as responsiveness to suggestions in experimental contexts, it is imperative that clinicians and researchers use robust measures of hypnotic suggestibility. The current paper critically evaluates contemporary measures of hypnotic suggestibility. After reviewing the most widely used measures, we identify multiple properties of these instruments that result in the loss of valuable information, including binary scoring and single-trial sampling, and hinder their utility, such as the inclusion of sub-optimal suggestion content. The scales are not well-suited for contemporary research questions and have outlived their usefulness. We conclude by outlining ways in which the measurement of hypnotic suggestibility can be advanced.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2021.1833209