Jiang, Lin; Kling, Gerhard; Bo, Hong and Driver, Ciaran. 2017. Why do firms adopt stock options and who benefits? A natural experiment in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 46(Part A), pp. 124-140. ISSN 0927-538X [Article]

Preview

Text jiang-etal-why-do-firms-adopt-stock-options-and-who-benefits-2017.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (677kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

A regulatory change in 2006, permitting equity compensations in China, offers a natural experiment to investigate drivers and outcomes of stock options. There are two unique features. First, adoption of stock options occurred rapidly compared to the US, where stock options have been around for more than 100 years with periods of high (1990s) and low (before 1950s) adoption. Second, stock options have been issued by state-owned enterprises (SOEs), an unusual aspect. This study analyzes all listed companies in China from 2004 to 2014, testing two competing theories: optimal contracting and managerial power. If managers own more equity, if the CEO also serves as board chairman and if compensation committees exist, managers are more likely to receive stock options. Ownership type and firm characteristics are also essential factors in granting stock options. In non-SOEs, evidence suggests that controlling shareholders award stock options less frequently but if they do they seem to induce managers to collude in tunneling. Applying a propensity score matching approach to account for an alleged self-selection bias, we do not observe any improvements in firm performance or shareholder value after stock options have been issued. Accordingly, managerial power seems to be the predominant driver for the introduction of stock options. Hence, managerial accountability and better disclosure are essential to ensure that stock options do contribute to value creation.

Item Type:	Article
Keywords:	Stock options, Managerial power, Optimal contracting
Dates:	Date Event 16 September 2017 Accepted 20 September 2017 Published Online December 2017 Published
Item ID:	30650
Date Deposited:	15 Nov 2021 13:55
Last Modified:	15 Nov 2021 13:55
Peer Reviewed:	Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.
URI:	https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/30650

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record (login required)