Zwartz, Micaiah; Thomson, Donald M. and Scott, Adrian J.. 2024. Identity crisis in eyewitness testimony: Exploring visual similarity judgments as an alternative to identification decisions. Criminal Law Journal, 47(2), pp. 93-108. ISSN 1321-6562 [Article]

No full text available

Text 2023 Zwartz et al. (CLJ).pdf - Accepted Version Permissions: Administrator Access Only Download (355kB)

Abstract or Description

Eyewitness identification evidence is notoriously problematic, and the leading cause of wrongful convictions. The Australian Law Reform Commission has suggested that evidence of resemblance, rather than identity, is the most accurate evidence a witness can give. However, current practices in Australia continue to rely upon evidence of identity. This article explores identification evidence from legal and psychological perspectives. The relevant legislation and psychological research are reviewed and the problems with current identification procedures are highlighted. A new method for conceptualising and capturing identification evidence is proposed involving similarity (or resemblance) as an alternative mechanism for gauging ‘sameness’. The advantages of similarity are discussed and the results from a study comparing traditional binary identifications with continuum-based similarity judgments are reported.

Item Type:	Article
Departments, Centres and Research Units:	Psychology Psychology > Forensic Psychology Unit
Dates:	Date Event 13 July 2023 Accepted 27 February 2024 Published
Item ID:	33949
Date Deposited:	19 Feb 2024 09:38
Last Modified:	17 May 2024 00:16
Peer Reviewed:	Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.
URI:	https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/33949

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record (login required)