On the ability of standard and brain-constrained deep neural networks to support cognitive superposition: a position paper
Garagnani, M.. 2024. On the ability of standard and brain-constrained deep neural networks to support cognitive superposition: a position paper. Cognitive Neurodynamics, ISSN 1871-4080 [Article] (In Press)
|
Text
Garagnani2024.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
|
Text
CognitiveSuperpositionR2-ACCEPTED.pdf - Accepted Version Permissions: Administrator Access Only Download (1MB) |
Abstract or Description
The ability to coactivate (or “superpose”) multiple conceptual representations is a fundamental function that we constantly rely upon; this is crucial in complex cognitive tasks requiring multi-item working memory, such as mental arithmetic, abstract reasoning, and language comprehension. As such, an artificial system aspiring to implement any of these aspects of general intelligence should be able to support this operation. I argue here that standard, feed-forward deep neural networks (DNNs) are unable to implement this function, whereas an alternative, fully brain-constrained class of neural architectures spontaneously exhibits it. On the basis of novel simulations, this proof-of-concept article shows that deep, brain-like networks trained with biologically realistic Hebbian learning mechanisms display the spontaneous emergence of internal circuits (cell assemblies) having features that make them natural candidates for supporting superposition. Building on previous computational modelling results, I also argue that, and offer an explanation as to why, in contrast, modern DNNs trained with gradient descent are generally unable to co-activate their internal representations. While deep brain-constrained neural architectures spontaneously develop the ability to support superposition as a result of (1) neurophysiologically accurate learning and (2) cortically realistic between-area connections, backpropagation-trained DNNs appear to be unsuited to implement this basic cognitive operation, arguably necessary for abstract thinking and general intelligence. The implications of this observation are briefly discussed in the larger context of existing and future artificial intelligence systems and neuro-realistic computational models.
Item Type: |
Article |
||||||
Identification Number (DOI): |
|||||||
Data Access Statement: |
All datasets generated during and/or analysed for the current study are available upon request from the author. |
||||||
Keywords: |
concept combination; multi-item working memory; brain-constrained modelling; semantic representations; artificial cognitive system; cell assembly; general intelligence |
||||||
Departments, Centres and Research Units: |
|||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||
Item ID: |
34532 |
||||||
Date Deposited: |
04 Jan 2024 11:17 |
||||||
Last Modified: |
05 Feb 2024 13:37 |
||||||
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed. |
||||||
URI: |
View statistics for this item...
Edit Record (login required) |