Prediction, pre-emption and limits to dissent: social media and big data uses for policing protests in the United Kingdom

Dencik, Lina; Hintz, Arne and Carey, Zoe. 2018. Prediction, pre-emption and limits to dissent: social media and big data uses for policing protests in the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 20(4), pp. 1433-1450. ISSN 1461-4448 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
dencik-et-al-2017-prediction-pre-emption-and-limits-to-dissent-social-media-and-big-data-uses-for-policing-protests-in.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (150kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

Social media and big data uses form part of a broader shift from 'reactive' to 'proactive' forms of governance in which state bodies engage in analysis to predict, pre-empt and respond in real time to a range of social problems. Drawing on research with British police, we contextualize these algorithmic processes within actual police practices, focusing on protest policing. Although aspects of algorithmic decision-making have become prominent in police practice, our research shows that they are embedded within a continuous human-computer negotiation that incorporates a rooted claim to 'professional judgement', an integrated intelligence context and a significant level of discretion. This context, we argue, transforms conceptions of threats. We focus particularly on three challenges: the inclusion of pre-existing biases and agendas, the prominence of marketing-driven software, and the interpretation of unpredictability. Such a contextualized analysis of data uses provides important insights for the shifting terrain of possibilities for dissent.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817697722

Additional Information:

Funding:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: The research for this article was made possible through a grant from the Media Democracy Fund, the Ford Foundation and the Open Society Foundations.

Keywords:

Big data, dissent, predictive policing, protest, social media

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Media, Communications and Cultural Studies

Dates:

DateEvent
13 February 2017Accepted
20 March 2017Published Online
April 2018Published

Item ID:

37299

Date Deposited:

17 Jul 2024 11:17

Last Modified:

17 Jul 2024 12:41

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/37299

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)