The politics of surveillance policy: UK regulatory dynamics after Snowden

Hintz, Arne and Dencik, Lina. 2016. The politics of surveillance policy: UK regulatory dynamics after Snowden. Internet Policy Review, 5(3), ISSN 2197-6775 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
policyreview-2016-3-424.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (215kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

The revelations by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden have illustrated the scale and extent of digital surveillance carried out by different security and intelligence agencies. The publications have led to a variety of concerns, public debate, and some diplomatic fallout regarding the legality of the surveillance, the extent of state interference in civic life, and the protection of civil rights in the context of security. Debates about the policy environment of surveillance emerged quickly after the leaks began, but actual policy change is only starting. In the UK, a draft law (Investigatory Powers Bill) has been proposed and is currently discussed. In this paper, we will trace the forces and dynamics that have shaped this particular policy response. Addressing surveillance policy as a site of struggle between different social forces and drawing on different fields across communication policy research, we suggest eight dynamics that, often in conflicting ways, have shaped the regulatory framework of surveillance policy in the UK since the Snowden leaks. These include the governmental context; national and international norms; court rulings; civil society advocacy; technical standards; private sector interventions; media coverage; and public opinion. We investigate how state surveillance has been met with criticism by parts of the technology industry and civil society, and that policy change was required as a result of legal challenges, review commissions and normative interventions. However a combination of specific government compositions, the strong role of security agendas and discourses, media justification and a muted reaction by the public have hindered a more fundamental review of surveillance practices so far and have moved policy debate towards the expansion, rather than the restriction, of surveillance in the aftermath of Snowden.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.3.424

Additional Information:

Funding:
The article is based on research conducted as part of the collaborative project ‘Digital Citizenship and Surveillance Society: State-Media-Citizen Relations After the Snowden Leaks’ which was based at Cardiff University from 2014 to 2016 and funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).

Keywords:

Edward Snowden, Blanket surveillance

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Media, Communications and Cultural Studies

Dates:

DateEvent
13 May 2016Accepted
26 September 2016Published

Item ID:

37307

Date Deposited:

24 Jul 2024 08:36

Last Modified:

25 Jul 2024 09:49

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/37307

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)