Teen girls, sexual double standards and 'sexting': gendered value in digital image exchange

Ringrose, Jessica; Harvey, Laura; Gill, Rosalind and Livingstone, Sonia. 2013. Teen girls, sexual double standards and 'sexting': gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), pp. 305-323. ISSN 1464-7001 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
ICCE-Gill2014d.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (378kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

This article explores gender inequities and sexual double standards in teens’ digital image exchange, drawing on a UK qualitative research project on youth ‘sexting’. We develop a critique of ‘postfeminist’ media cultures, suggesting teen ‘sexting’ presents specific age and gender related contradictions: teen girls are called upon to produce particular forms of ‘sexy’ self display, yet face legal repercussions, moral condemnation and ‘slut shaming’ when they do so. We examine the production/circulation of gendered value and sexual morality via teens’ discussions of activities on Facebook and Blackberry. For instance, some boys accumulated ‘ratings’ by possessing and exchanging images of girls’ breasts, which operated as a form of currency and value. Girls, in contrast, largely discussed the taking, sharing or posting of such images as risky, potentially inciting blame and shame around sexual reputation (e.g. being called ‘slut’, ‘slag’ or ‘sket’). The daily negotiations of these new digitally mediated, heterosexualised, classed and raced norms of performing teen feminine and masculine desirability are considered.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853

Additional Information:

© 2013 The Authors

Keywords:

Blackberry messenger, digital images, Facebook, 'sexualisation', slut-shaming, social networking, teen femininity, teen masculinity

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Institute for Cultural and Creative Entrepreneurship (ICCE)

Dates:

DateEvent
14 November 2013Published Online
December 2013Published

Item ID:

37677

Date Deposited:

27 Sep 2024 08:50

Last Modified:

27 Sep 2024 11:12

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/37677

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)