Examining the reliability of Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) as an assessment tool in educational settings

Kimbell, Richard. 2022. Examining the reliability of Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) as an assessment tool in educational settings. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), pp. 1515-1529. ISSN 0957-7572 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
s10798-021-09654-w.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (867kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

Conventional approaches to assessment involve teachers and examiners judging the quality of learners work by reference to lists of criteria or other ‘outcome’ statements. This paper explores a quite different method of assessment using ‘Adaptive Comparative Judgement’ (ACJ) that was developed within a research project at Goldsmiths University of London between 2004 and 2010. The method was developed into a tool that enabled judges to distinguish better/worse performances not by allocating numbers through mark schemes, but rather by direct, holistic, judgement. The tool was successfully deployed through a series of national and international research and development exercises. But game-changing innovations are never flaw-less first time out (Golley, Jet: Frank Whittle and the Invention of the Jet Engine, Datum Publishing, Liphook Hampshire, 2009; Dyson, Against the odds: an autobiography, Texere Publishing, Knutsford Cheshire, 2001) and a series of careful investigations resulted in a problem being identified within the workings of ACJ (Bramley, Investigating the reliability of Adaptive Comparative Judgment, Cambridge Assessment Research Report, UK, Cambridge, 2015). The issue was with the ‘adaptive’ component of the algorithm that, under certain conditions, appeared to exaggerate the reliability statistic. The problem was ‘worked’ by the software company running ACJ and a solution found. This paper reports the whole sequence of events—from the original innovation, through deployment, the emergent problem, and the resulting solution that was published at an international conference (Rangel Smith and Lynch in: PATT36 International Conference. Research & Practice in Technology Education: Perspectives on Human Capacity and Development, 2018) and subsequently deployed within a modified ACJ algorithm.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09654-w

Keywords:

Adaptive comparative judgement (ACJ), Assessment, Reliability, Holistic judgement

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Design

Dates:

DateEvent
29 January 2021Accepted
23 February 2021Published Online
July 2022Published

Item ID:

37818

Date Deposited:

08 Nov 2024 09:56

Last Modified:

08 Nov 2024 10:00

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/37818

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)