Political Epistemology Beyond Democratic Theory: Introduction to Symposium on Power Without Knowledge

Tools

Gunn, Paul. 2020. Political Epistemology Beyond Democratic Theory: Introduction to Symposium on Power Without Knowledge. Critical Review, 32(1-3), pp. 1-31. ISSN 0891-3811 [Article]

Preview

Text
Political Epistemology Beyond Democratic Theory Introduction to Symposium on Power Without Knowledge.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (515kB) | Preview

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2020.1889125

Abstract or Description

Jeffrey Friedman’s Power Without Knowledge builds a critical epistemology of technocracy, rather than a democratic argument against it. For its democratic critics, technocracy is illegitimate because it amounts to the rule of cognitive elites, violating principles of mutual respect and collective self-determination. For its proponents, technocracy’s legitimacy depends on its ability to use reliable knowledge to solve social and economic problems. But Friedman demonstrates that to meet the proponents' “internal,” epistemic standard of legitimacy, technocrats would have to reckon with the heterogeneity of people’s ideas, which he presents as one of two aspects of a political anthropology of ideational beings. The other aspect is ideational determinism: the shaping of our conscious actions by our interpretations, and of our interpretations by “ideational exposures” (which are, to some extent, heterogeneous). For the most part, our symposiasts agree with this anthropology or leave it uncontested, but they fall back on democratic theory to point toward alternatives to technocracy. This raises the question, which Friedman does not ask, of whether his political anthropology undermines a certain brand of democratic theory: the liberal brand that attaches respect to people’s opinions as products of “free reflection,” i.e., as underdetermined.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2020.1889125

Keywords:

democratic theory; ideational determinism; ideational heterogeneity; intellectual charity; political anthropology; political epistemology; political ignorance; social science; populism; Jeffrey Friedman

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Politics

Dates: