Accusations of malicious intent in debates about the Palestine-Israel conflict and about antisemitism The Livingstone Formulation, ‘playing the antisemitism card’ and contesting the boundaries of antiracist discourse
Hirsh, David. 2010. Accusations of malicious intent in debates about the Palestine-Israel conflict and about antisemitism The Livingstone Formulation, ‘playing the antisemitism card’ and contesting the boundaries of antiracist discourse. Transversal, 1, pp. 47-77. ISSN 1 607-629X [Article]
|
Text
hirsh_transversal_2010.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract or Description
This paper is concerned with a rhetorical formulation which is sometimes deployed in response to an accusation of antisemitism, particularly when it relates to discourse which is of the form of criticism of Israel. This formulation is a defensive response which deploys a counter-accusation that the person raising the issue of antisemitism is doing so in bad faith and dishonestly. I have called it The Livingstone Formulation (Hirsh 2007, 2008).
Item Type: |
Article |
||||
Keywords: |
"Livingstone formulation" |
||||
Departments, Centres and Research Units: |
|||||
Dates: |
|
||||
Item ID: |
7144 |
||||
Date Deposited: |
06 Jul 2012 12:45 |
||||
Last Modified: |
29 Apr 2020 15:45 |
||||
Peer Reviewed: |
Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed. |
||||
URI: |
View statistics for this item...
Edit Record (login required) |