Research Online

Logo

Goldsmiths - University of London

The Countercultural Potential of Citizen Science

McQuillan, Daniel. 2014. The Countercultural Potential of Citizen Science. M/C Journal, 17(6), [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
mcquillan-countercultural-potential-of-citizen-science.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives.

Download (146kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

What is the countercultural potential of citizen science? As a participant in the wider citizen science movement, I can attest that contemporary citizen science initiatives rarely characterise themselves as countercultural. Rather, the goal of most citizen science projects is to be seen as producing orthodox scientific knowledge: the ethos is respectability rather than rebellion (NERC). I will suggest instead that there are resonances with the counterculture that emerged in the 1960s, most visibly through an emphasis on participatory experimentation and the principles of environmental sustainability and social justice.
This will be illustrated by example, through two citizen science projects that have a commitment to combining social values with scientific practice. I will then describe the explicitly countercultural organisation, Science for the People, which arose from within the scientific community itself, out of opposition to the Vietnam War. Methodological and conceptual weaknesses in the authoritative model of science are explored, suggesting that there is an opportunity for citizen science to become anti-hegemonic by challenging the hegemony of science itself. This reformulation will be expressed through Deleuze and Guattari's notion of nomadic science, the means through which citizen science could become countercultural.

Item Type:

Article

Keywords:

counterculture, citizen science, Science for the People, Theodore Roszak, hegemony, Isabelle Stengers

Related URLs:

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Computing

Dates:

DateEvent
December 2014Published

Item ID:

11482

Date Deposited:

21 Apr 2015 08:01

Last Modified:

10 Jul 2018 01:47

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/11482

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)