Research Online

Logo

Goldsmiths - University of London

Statecraft as a Straightjacket: A Reply to Gamble and Hayton

Griffiths, Simon. 2016. Statecraft as a Straightjacket: A Reply to Gamble and Hayton. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(3), pp. 735-743. ISSN 0031-2290 [Article]

No full text available
[img] Text
Parliam Aff-2016-Griffiths-735-43.pdf - Published Version
Permissions: Administrator Access Only

Download (109kB)

Abstract or Description

‘Statecraft’ theory, with its focus on politicians' strategic, electoral choices, has undergone a revival in recent years. This is a reply to those authors who have used ‘Statecraft’ in their analysis of the Conservative Party under David Cameron [notably Hayton (2014) Parliamentary Affairs 67, 1; Gamble (2014) Parliamentary Affairs]. Statecraft theory raises various questions and contains implications—ontological, epistemic and methodological—that need to be dealt with by its contemporary advocates. I conclude that while the contributions discussed here are a valuable reminder that strategic thinking is an important part of what any politician does, strict adherence to the Statecraft model is a straitjacket to our understanding of British politics.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv050

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Politics

Dates:

DateEvent
July 2016Published
September 2015Published Online

Item ID:

18762

Date Deposited:

04 Oct 2018 13:40

Last Modified:

04 Oct 2018 13:40

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/18762

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)