Research Online

Logo

Goldsmiths - University of London

The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing.

Kontogianni, F; Hope, Lorraine; Taylor, P. J.; Vrij, A and Gabbert, Fiona. 2018. The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(3), pp. 454-461. ISSN 2211-3681 [Article]

[img] Text
Kontogianni et al., SGC Timeline, accepted version.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (170kB)

Abstract or Description

Obtaining detailed accounts from individuals who have witnessed complex events under challenging encoding conditions presents a difficulty for investigators. In the present research, participants (N = 132) reported their recall of an event witnessed under full or divided attention using a timeline reporting format. Extending the Timeline Technique to assess the relative performance of two additional mnemonics, Self-Generated Cues (SGC) and Other-Generated Cues (OGC), participants provided an account across three Timeline reporting conditions comparing the efficacy of SGC, OGC, and No Cues (control). Mock-witnesses using SGC provided more correct details than mock-witnesses in the OGC or No Cues conditions, under full but not under divided attention conditions. There was no difference between cue conditions with respect to the number of errors reported across attention conditions. Findings show SGC to be a promising addition to interviewing techniques as a retrieval support mnemonic with implications for applied contexts.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006

Keywords:

Information gathering, Timeline, cognitive mnemonics, self-generated cues, memory retrieval, divided attention

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Psychology

Dates:

DateEvent
20 March 2018Accepted
21 April 2018Published Online
September 2018Published

Item ID:

23095

Date Deposited:

23 Mar 2018 11:52

Last Modified:

29 Apr 2020 16:47

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/23095

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)