(In)credible Subjects: NGOs, Attorneys, and Permissible “LGBT Asylum Seeker” Identities

Tools

McGuirk, Siobhan. 2018. (In)credible Subjects: NGOs, Attorneys, and Permissible “LGBT Asylum Seeker” Identities. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 41(S1), pp. 4-15. ISSN 1081-6976 [Article]

Text (.docx)
Incredible Subjects_Accepted Version.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (70kB)

Preview

Text (.pdf)
Incredible Subjects_Accepted Version.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (409kB) | Preview

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12250

Abstract or Description

In this paper, I demonstrate how statist logics concerning acceptable lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or transgender (LGBT) immigrants permeate civic spheres, creating new forms of exclusion for asylum seekers in the United States. Existing research on U.S. asylum policy and procedures as they pertain to LGBT claimants suggests that a “gay enough” litmus test typifies U.S. Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS) adjudications, such that officers expect claimants to engage in conspicuous consumption of stereotypical commodities and culture, and to appear visibly “LGBT,” through gender non-conformity, or by being “out.” My analysis focuses on the social, as well as legal, lives of LGBT asylum seekers in the United States. Drawing on ethnographic and interview data collected at specialist NGOs, I argue that limited ideas about LGBT subjectivity often structure NGO workers’ attitudes and practices in ways that echo USCIS criteria for granting asylum. I demonstrate how NGO client selection and intake processes subtly yet effectively replicate existing adjudication norms, and prevailing ideas about LGBT subjectivity. Within ostensibly non-governmental spaces, LGBT asylum seekers experience suspicion, surveillance, and pressure to conform to NGO workers’ expectations of “credible” claimants. Contrary to NGOs’ stated intentions, these processes extend, rather than challenge, existing barriers to asylum.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12250