Research Online

Logo

Goldsmiths - University of London

Gender Gap in Savings Goal Choice: Evidence from Mixed Methods

Hillig, Ariane; Monne, Jerome; Rutterford, Janette and Sotiropoulos, Dimitris P.. 2019. Gender Gap in Savings Goal Choice: Evidence from Mixed Methods. Working Paper. Goldsmiths, University of London, London. [Report]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

There has been a good deal of research on gender psychological differences in the context of financial decision making, but no research on the impact of gender difference in the setting of savings goals. To address this question we use two unique datasets, one quantitative and one qualitative. Our quantitative results show that men set more challenging savings goals than women, even when we control for wealth, income, and portfolio risk taking. Our qualitative results corroborate these findings. Women are more likely to be content with targeting a comfortable life in retirement, setting an unambitious savings targets. They also tend to be more concerned than men by eventual possible future impediments to saving, such as adverse income shocks. This causesthem to focus more on the accessibility of their savings which implies that they are more likely to anticipate that they will have to reduce savings in the future. In contrast, men seem less concerned about possible future barriers to saving money. They are also more committed to saving and to wealth accumulation.

Item Type:

Report (Working Paper)

Keywords:

Savings goal, Gender gap, Commitment to save, Consumers’ behaviour, Mixed methods, Gender gap in wealth

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Institute of Management Studies

Date:

6 November 2019

Item ID:

28200

Date Deposited:

17 Feb 2020 16:04

Last Modified:

18 May 2020 18:16

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/28200

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)