Expert search strategies: the information retrieval practices of healthcare information professionals

Russell-Rose, Tony and Chamberlain, Jon. 2017. Expert search strategies: the information retrieval practices of healthcare information professionals. JMIR Medical Informatics, 5(4), e33. ISSN 2291-9694 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
7680-145857-4-PB.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (989kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

Background: Healthcare information professionals play a key role in closing the knowledge gap between medical research and clinical practice. Their work involves meticulous searching of literature databases using complex search strategies that can consist of hundreds of keywords, operators, and ontology terms. This process is prone to error and can lead to inefficiency and bias if performed incorrectly.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the search behavior of healthcare information professionals, uncovering their needs, goals, and requirements for information retrieval systems.

Methods: A survey was distributed to healthcare information professionals via professional association email discussion lists. It investigated the search tasks they undertake, their techniques for search strategy formulation, their approaches to evaluating search results, and their preferred functionality for searching library-style databases. The popular literature search system PubMed was then evaluated to determine the extent to which their needs were met.

Results: The 107 respondents indicated that their information retrieval process relied on the use of complex, repeatable, and transparent search strategies. On average it took 60 minutes to formulate a search strategy, with a search task taking 4 hours and consisting of 15 strategy lines. Respondents reviewed a median of 175 results per search task, far more than they would ideally like (100). The most desired features of a search system were merging search queries and combining search results.

Conclusions: Healthcare information professionals routinely address some of the most challenging information retrieval problems of any profession. However, their needs are not fully supported by current literature search systems and there is demand for improved functionality, in particular regarding the development and management of search strategies.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.7680

Keywords:

review, surveys and questionnaires, search engine, information management, information systems

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Computing

Dates:

DateEvent
2 October 2017Published
18 September 2017Published Online
10 July 2017Accepted

Item ID:

27126

Date Deposited:

11 Oct 2019 17:35

Last Modified:

15 Apr 2020 15:13

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/27126

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)