Anti-Equivalence: Pragmatics of post-liberal dispute

Davies, Will. 2020. Anti-Equivalence: Pragmatics of post-liberal dispute. European Journal of Social Theory, ISSN 1368-4310 [Article] (In Press)

[img]
Preview
Text
Davies, W. (2020) Anti-Equivalence_AAM.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (282kB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

In the early 21st century, liberal democracies have witnessed their foundational norms of critique and deliberation being disrupted by a combination of populist and technological forces. A distinctive style of dispute has appeared, in which a speaker denounces the unfairness of all liberal and institutional systems of equivalence, including the measures of law, economics and the various other ‘tests’ which convention scholars have deemed core to organisations. The article reviews how sociologists of critique have tended to treat critical capacities as oriented towards consensus, but then considers how technologies of real-time ‘control’ circumvent liberal critique altogether. In response, a different type of dispute emerges in the digital public sphere, which abandons equivalences in general, instead adopting a non-representational template of warfare. This style of post-liberal dispute is manifest in the rhetoric of populists, but does not originate there.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431020945841

Keywords:

Disputes, liberalism, public sphere, control, populism

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Politics
Politics > Political Economy Research Centre

Dates:

DateEvent
3 July 2020Accepted
17 August 2020Published Online

Item ID:

28950

Date Deposited:

03 Jul 2020 15:32

Last Modified:

21 Nov 2020 06:45

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/28950

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)