Sounds of February, Smells of October: The Russian Revolution as Sensory Experience

Plamper, Jan. 2020. Sounds of February, Smells of October: The Russian Revolution as Sensory Experience. American Historical Review, pp. 1-26. ISSN 0002-8762 [Article] (In Press)

No full text available
[img] Text
10292020_Plamper_final draft.pdf - Accepted Version
Permissions: Administrator Access Only until 31 December 2022.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (516kB)

Abstract or Description

Temporally speaking, the Russian Revolution of 1917 was not a news item, not even a rumor, but first and foremost novel sensory impressions—gunshots with live ammunition from unusual places, the smell of burnt police files. This article explores the sensory history of the revolution through ego-documents like diaries and memoirs. It tracks in detail how people of various backgrounds in Petrograd and Moscow lived the olfactory class struggles after February and the taste excesses of the post-October “wine pogroms,” how they expressed a new experience of time in a sensory idiom, and how they ultimately became habituated to the new sounds and sights. Historiography is at a propitious moment to move beyond a dichotomy of discourse vs. “raw” experience: conjoining the histories of experience, the senses, and the emotions, the article probes what is to be gained from interpreting a world-historical event with a concept of experience as an integrated, multimodal, simultaneous sensory-emotional-cognitive process. Avant-garde artists, contemporaries of the Russian Revolution, foreshadowed such a holistic concept of experience by a century.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhaa575

Keywords:

Revolution, Violence, Russia Soviet, Senses

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

History

Dates:

DateEvent
1 June 2020Accepted
31 December 2020Published Online

Item ID:

29517

Date Deposited:

02 Dec 2020 14:09

Last Modified:

26 Jan 2021 21:26

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/29517

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)