A critical review of standardized measures of hypnotic suggestibility

Acunzo, David and Terhune, Devin Blair. 2020. A critical review of standardized measures of hypnotic suggestibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, ISSN 0020-7144 [Article] (Forthcoming)

No full text available
[img] Text
gold standard_FINAL.pdf - Accepted Version
Permissions: Administrator Access Only until 8 June 2021.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (375kB)

Abstract or Description

The most well-established finding gleaned from decades of experimental hypnosis research is that individuals display marked variability in responsiveness to hypnotic suggestions. Insofar as this variability impacts both treatment outcome in therapeutic applications of hypnosis as well as responsiveness to suggestions in experimental contexts, it is imperative that clinicians and researchers use robust measures of hypnotic suggestibility. The current paper critically evaluates contemporary measures of hypnotic suggestibility. After reviewing the most widely used measures, we identify multiple properties of these instruments that result in the loss of valuable information, including binary scoring and single-trial sampling, and hinder their utility, such as the inclusion of sub-optimal suggestion content. The scales are not well-suited for contemporary research questions and have outlived their usefulness. We conclude by outlining ways in which the measurement of hypnotic suggestibility can be advanced.

Item Type:

Article

Keywords:

hypnosis, hypnotizability, measurement, psychometrics, suggestion

Related URLs:

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Psychology

Dates:

DateEvent
8 June 2020Accepted

Item ID:

28745

Date Deposited:

10 Jun 2020 08:49

Last Modified:

11 Jun 2020 15:38

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/28745

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)