Research Online

Logo

Goldsmiths - University of London

Intersubjective science

Velmans, Max. 1999. Intersubjective science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(2-3), pp. 299-306. ISSN 1355-8250 [Article]

No full text available

Abstract or Description

The study of consciousness in modern science is hampered by deeply ingrained, dualist presuppositions about the nature of consciousness. In particular, conscious experiences are thought to be private and subjective, contrasting with physical phenomena which are public and objective. In the present article, I argue that all observed phenomena are, in a sense, private to a given observer, although there are some events to which there is public access. Phenomena can be objective in the sense of intersubjective, investigators can be objective in the sense of truthful or dispassionate, and procedures can be objective in being well-specified, but observed phenomena cannot be objective in the sense of being observer-free. Phenomena are only repeatable in the sense that they are judged by a community of observers to be tokens of the same type. Stripped of its dualist trappings the empirical method becomes if you carry out these procedures you will observe or experience these results - which applies as much to a science of consciousness as it does to physics.

Item Type:

Article

Keywords:

consciousness, dualist, empirical method, intersubjective, objective, private, repeatability, science, subjective

Related URLs:

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Psychology

Dates:

DateEvent
February 1999Published

Item ID:

26185

Date Deposited:

10 Apr 2019 13:45

Last Modified:

10 Apr 2019 13:45

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/26185

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)