Information-Theoretic Measures Predict the Human Judgment of Rhythm Complexity

de Fleurian, Remi; Blackwell, Tim M.; Ben-Tal, Oded and Müllensiefen, Daniel. 2017. Information-Theoretic Measures Predict the Human Judgment of Rhythm Complexity. Cognitive Science, 41(3), pp. 800-813. ISSN 0364-0213 [Article]

[img]
Preview
Text
Cognitive Science pdf.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract or Description

To formalize the human judgment of rhythm complexity, we used five measures from information theory and algorithmic complexity to measure the complexity of 48 artificially generated rhythmic sequences. We compared these measurements to human prediction accuracy and easiness judgments obtained from a listening experiment, in which 32 participants guessed the last beat of each sequence. We also investigated the modulating effects of musical expertise and general pattern identification ability. Entropy rate and Kolmogorov complexity were correlated with prediction accuracy, and highly correlated with easiness judgments. A logistic regression showed main effects of musical training, entropy rate, and Kolmogorov complexity, and an interaction between musical training and both entropy rate and Kolmogorov complexity. These results indicate that information-theoretic concepts capture some salient features of the human judgment of rhythm complexity, and they confirm the influence of musical expertise on complexity judgments.

Item Type:

Article

Identification Number (DOI):

https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12347

Keywords:

Rhythm perception; Rhythm complexity; Information theory measures; Entropy rate; Kolmogorov complexity; Musical expertise

Departments, Centres and Research Units:

Computing

Dates:

DateEvent
April 2017Published
17 February 2016Published Online
7 December 2015Accepted

Item ID:

22426

Date Deposited:

24 Nov 2017 10:16

Last Modified:

29 Apr 2020 16:42

Peer Reviewed:

Yes, this version has been peer-reviewed.

URI:

https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/22426

View statistics for this item...

Edit Record Edit Record (login required)